This little book is published in association with Tezuka Productions and probably in conjunction with a similar titled exhibition held at the National Gallery of Victoria 3 Nov'06-28Jan'07. Odd that I was still a member then but hardly remembered this exhibition. Must have been the time I felt so cheated by the NGV for its overhyped and under-represented exhibits generally. I shall not go into a spiel about the post-impressionist exhibition of the same era.
Anyway, Philip Brophy is a wind-bag. His introductions make the book hard to read. But Brophy is not representative of the essayists represented in the book. Some are pretty thought provoking, the others offer just glimpses. Generally these are good essays which explains why Brophy's introductions sound empty like the wind.
I am taking notes here for future consideration.
One particularly interesting insight is the question of "framing" in Manga and in which the sense of action, and time is redefined by Tezuka's framing of illustrations. The essay :Where has Tezuka Gone? by Fusanosuke Natsume. (p 31 -)
"In manga time can be flexibly manipulated by events broken up into frames; although the practice had not been consciously employed from manga's inception; rather, it took decades to develop. ... The lineal space between each frame of modern manga is not just a margin. "
Over decades, the reader had to be taught how to read the symbols, the signs, the juxtapositions, and as they internalised more and more of the meaning, manga artists could then create new 'dimensions" of illustrations using frames, speech bubbles, and multilayered events. (p33)
This idea of time is also explored by Ichiro Takeuchi in Tezuka and the Origin of Story Manga.
"There are three separate temporal elements in reading manga. The first is defined by how the narrative is organised; the second by how long it takes to read the story; and the third by how events are graphically framed. These three distinct yet simultaneous elements interact with and affect each other, creating narrative constructs of synchronisation and syncopation. Consequently, frames that are conscious of time define the speed by which they are read; a densely drawn frame takes more time to read; a sparsely rendered frame less. The resulting multilayered events of time-manipulating frames are not strictly Tezuka's invention, but he was the dominant driving force of this mode of manga expression."
This idea of time is also explored by Ichiro Takeuchi in Tezuka and the Origin of Story Manga.
"Modern manga actively engages the reader emotionally with the narrative rhythm created by a sequence of illustrations. in contrast, American and French comics generate less rhythm. American comics contain more text and require a longer time to read, while French comics with their fine-art approach distract our attention and also slow the reading process. Crucially, both strains of comics lack pacing. " (p88)
Anyway, food for thought, good book, worth a more paced, detailed reading.